Re: Branch management, wip-ppc64le, and POWER9

[Leo Famulari]

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 01:53:37PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> The signatures will be lost, but for "wip-" branches the expectation has
> always been that history may be rewritten. For me, rebasing is a more
> comfortable workflow for this kind of exploratory branch. I recommend
> against using merges here.

And by the way, one can re-sign an arbitrary range of commits like this:

$ which git-sign
git-sign () {
        case $# in
                ("0") range=HEAD  ;;
                ("1") range=$1  ;;
                (*) echo "too many arguments" >&2
                        return 1 ;;
        esac
        git rebase "$range" --exec "git commit --amend --no-edit --gpg-sign" || 
git rebase --abort
}

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature