[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 01/07: gnu: python-packaging: Update to 20.4.
From: |
Tanguy LE CARROUR |
Subject: |
Re: 01/07: gnu: python-packaging: Update to 20.4. |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Dec 2020 08:56:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
astroid/0.15.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) |
Hi Marius!
Excerpts from Marius Bakke's message of December 2, 2020 12:10 am:
> Hello,
>
> guix-commits@gnu.org skriver:
>
>> ngz pushed a commit to branch master
>> in repository guix.
>>
>> commit 71b15b4874b7f9ec7001d2916a8ab27dcce6cdc0
>> Author: Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy@bioneland.org>
>> AuthorDate: Mon Nov 30 10:48:57 2020 +0100
>>
>> gnu: python-packaging: Update to 20.4.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm (python-packaging): Update to 20.4.
>> [source]: Remove patch that has been merged upstream.
>> * gnu/packages/patches/python-packaging-test-arch.patch: Remove file.
>> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Apply removal.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
>
> I have just reverted this patch on 'master' because it caused 6328
> rebuilds.
So, this is the situation Nicolas was talking about!
Sorry guys for the inconvenience! :-(
> It's not obvious, because they come via the 'bootstrap'
> variant defined below the main package:
>
> $ guix refresh -l -e '(@ (gnu packages python-xyz)
> python-packaging-bootstrap)'
> Building the following 2399 packages would ensure 6328 dependent
> packages are rebuilt: [...]
>
> Not sure how we can improve on this. Thoughts?
What about applying the same `/next` trick that you suggested for
`distlib`?
> @Tanguy: do you know if Poetry will still work with the old version?
Probably not… I'll have to check. But anyway, Sébastien and I might be
the only persons using it, so… it's no big deal, I guess! :-)
Thanks for caring!
--
Tanguy