[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A plan for parameterized packages
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: A plan for parameterized packages |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Nov 2020 19:09:25 +0100 |
Hi Pierre,
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 18:44, Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> wrote:
> For instance, what if we want to build "all packages without X support"?
> This means that the parameter must traverse all inputs recursively if we
> don't want to drag X indirectly.
It means: add this new ’optionally’ to all the packages supporting X to
be able to turn it off with the ’boolean’ type. IIUC.
> If I understand your change correctly, the patch is only applying
> parameters to the given package and it's not propagated to the inputs,
> is that correct?
Because of ’package-input-rewriting/spec’, it is applied to all the
graph, IIUC.
Cheers,
simon
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/11/15
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, Taylan Kammer, 2020/11/15
Re: A plan for parameterized packages, Danny Milosavljevic, 2020/11/15