[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?) |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Sep 2020 20:08:15 +0200 |
Hi,
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 19:29, Giovanni Biscuolo <g@xelera.eu> wrote:
> P.S.: I also know there's the http://issues.guix.gnu.org/41732#7
> "Implement a wrapper so users can build the Emacs packages using a
> version of their choosing" patch around, but it's for a different
> (expert) use case AFAIU
Now this patch is superseded by <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/43578>. :-)
If I understand correctly #43578 (not yet really tested).
Cheers,
simon
- Emacs closure at ~900MB?, zimoun, 2020/09/22
- Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/22
- emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/24
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?),
zimoun <=
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/25
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/25
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/25
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/29
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/29
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/29
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Mark H Weaver, 2020/09/26
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/26
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Mark H Weaver, 2020/09/26
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/27