[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feeble attempt at using xattr gnu.translator
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: Feeble attempt at using xattr gnu.translator |
Date: |
Mon, 11 May 2020 10:58:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen, le lun. 11 mai 2020 10:53:58 +0200, a ecrit:
> Samuel Thibault writes:
>
> > Samuel Thibault, le lun. 11 mai 2020 10:42:08 +0200, a ecrit:
> >> > diskfs_S_file_set_translator (struct protid *cred,
> >> > [...]
> >> > if (passivelen && passive[passivelen - 1])
> >> > return EINVAL;
> >> >
> >> > hmm; so even when there are no arguments, VALUE must end with 0?!
> >>
> >> That
> >
> > That's a bit sad, but I'm not so surprised either. I don't remember if
> > that was discussed at the time.
>
> At first glance it felt like a bug/non-finished thing; setttrans does
> not require the user to resort to \0-hackery.
It does not because settrans is supposed to *be* the user-visible
interface. setfattr is not supposed to be.
Samuel