Re: unexpected reproducibility of reproducible blog post?

[zimoun]

Hi Konrad,

On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 11:26, Konrad Hinsen <address@hidden> wrote:

> > Has the file 'guix-version-for-reproduction.txt' been tracked?
>
> Unfortunately not. The repository for the preparation of the post
> is at
>
>   https://github.com/khinsen/reproducibility-with-guix/
>
> but it doesn't contain the file 'guix-version-for-reproduction.txt'.

Argh! The author should watch the Fun MOOC about computational
reproducibility. ;-)


> > Is really the commit 769b96b62e8c09b078f73adc09fb860505920f8f used to
> > produce the Docker image listed in the blog post?
>
> Hard to say... I can't play with that right now because I am running
> jobs on my computer that eat all the memory.

Leo reproduced the new observed hash.


> One question I have been wondering about is the possibility of grafts
> being an obstacle to reproducibility. Grafts are something I don't
> really understand yet, so I cannot answer this question. In particular,
> does a grafted package get a different hash from a package built with
> grafting disabled?

Grafts or maybe Guile 2 -> 3?


Cheers,
simon