guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: nss-certs: hash mismatch on berlin


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: Re: nss-certs: hash mismatch on berlin
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 19:10:11 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)

Hello,

Björn Höfling <address@hidden> skribis:

> Hi Ludo,
> Hi Guix,
>
> while trying to build a new installer-image, I encountered:
>
>  nss-certs-3.44.1  150KiB                                                     
>                              4.0MiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0%
>
> sha256 hash mismatch for 
> /gnu/store/32hy1jqkam201l7c4wg3bhxz4x5l5jy0-nss-certs-3.44.1:
>   expected hash: 0vbkb5mcwzbz4lm1c1319pail61785sd3lj6526vl5hdnp1rxyad
>   actual hash:   1awgljvsvc141350xyjjnb15hk66qpcpzwz0hrly11yfbw6wn7cv
> substitution of /gnu/store/32hy1jqkam201l7c4wg3bhxz4x5l5jy0-nss-certs-3.44.1 
> failed

Like Ricardo, I get the correct hash everywhere:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ wget -qO - 
http://berlin.guix.gnu.org/32hy1jqkam201l7c4wg3bhxz4x5l5jy0.narinfo | grep Hash
NarHash: sha256:0vbkb5mcwzbz4lm1c1319pail61785sd3lj6526vl5hdnp1rxyad
$ wget -qO - 
http://berlin.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/32hy1jqkam201l7c4wg3bhxz4x5l5jy0-nss-certs-3.44.1
 | lzip -d | guix hash -
0vbkb5mcwzbz4lm1c1319pail61785sd3lj6526vl5hdnp1rxyad
$ wget -qO - 
http://berlin.guix.gnu.org/nar/gzip/32hy1jqkam201l7c4wg3bhxz4x5l5jy0-nss-certs-3.44.1
 | gunzip | guix hash -
0vbkb5mcwzbz4lm1c1319pail61785sd3lj6526vl5hdnp1rxyad
$ wget -qO - 
http://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/32hy1jqkam201l7c4wg3bhxz4x5l5jy0-nss-certs-3.44.1
 | lzip -d | guix hash -
0vbkb5mcwzbz4lm1c1319pail61785sd3lj6526vl5hdnp1rxyad
$ wget -qO - 
http://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/gzip/32hy1jqkam201l7c4wg3bhxz4x5l5jy0-nss-certs-3.44.1
 | gunzip | guix hash -
0vbkb5mcwzbz4lm1c1319pail61785sd3lj6526vl5hdnp1rxyad
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Could you run these commands locally and see what you get?

Could it be lack of disk space or a transient networking issue on your side?

Thanks,
Ludo’.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]