[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FOSDEM 2019 stand applications
From: |
Björn Höfling |
Subject: |
Re: FOSDEM 2019 stand applications |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:02:42 +0100 |
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 23:16:47 -0600
Brett Gilio <address@hidden> wrote:
> Bummer,
>
> Did they provide any more feedback so that we can be more prepared
> next year as more likely candidates?
No.
I think in general there is the problem of high demand and only a
fixed size of stands. I'm not sure if there is anything we could do to
improve our application text. On FOSDEM I will be asking other stands
how they did it, how much effort they put into it and what tricks they
have.
Anyway, it was a first trial, we didn't put too much effort into it and
we can now just concentrate on the 2 Guix-days before FOSDEM.
Björn
pgpWp3ocL7Wzc.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Fw: FOSDEM 2019 stand applications, Björn Höfling, 2018/11/22
- Re: Fw: FOSDEM 2019 stand applications, Brett Gilio, 2018/11/23
- Re: FOSDEM 2019 stand applications,
Björn Höfling <=
- Re: FOSDEM 2019 stand applications, Pjotr Prins, 2018/11/23
- Re: FOSDEM 2019 stand applications, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/11/23
- Re: FOSDEM 2019 stand applications, Brett Gilio, 2018/11/23
- Re: FOSDEM 2019 stand applications, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/11/23
- Re: FOSDEM 2019 stand applications, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2018/11/23
- Re: FOSDEM 2019 stand applications, Tonton, 2018/11/23