[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Making javadoc reproducible
From: |
Danny Milosavljevic |
Subject: |
Re: Making javadoc reproducible |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:09:46 +0200 |
Hi Gabor,
> There is a command line flag for javadoc (notimestamp), that disables
> generating the comment in the docs that contains the timestamp.
> Currently I see two ways forward:
> 1. Track down the calls to javadoc, and add the flag to all calls.
> 2. Write a simple patch to make javadoc behave as if notimestamp was
> specified, whenever
> SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is defined.
> I do not think, that the patch produced by 2 is upstreamable, but it
> seems much less work. WDYT?
I'd like option 2 more. Also, I think it should be upstreamable.
Thanks for working on tihs!
I've meant to tackle this for quite some time but I didn't find how icedtea
gets the jdk sources in the first place (in order to patch it).
Putting a patch into the "patches" subdir blindly should work, but I
didn't try.
pgpx0d0tnhK8F.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Making javadoc reproducible, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/10/12
- Re: Making javadoc reproducible, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/10/12
- Re: Making javadoc reproducible, Björn Höfling, 2018/10/12
- Re: Making javadoc reproducible, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/10/12
- Re: Making javadoc reproducible, Vagrant Cascadian, 2018/10/12
- Re: Making javadoc reproducible, Alex Vong, 2018/10/13
- Re: Making javadoc reproducible, Chris Marusich, 2018/10/13
- Re: Making javadoc reproducible, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/10/14
- Re: Making javadoc reproducible, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/10/14
Re: Making javadoc reproducible,
Danny Milosavljevic <=