[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 01/01: gnu: Add badass.
From: |
Oleg Pykhalov |
Subject: |
Re: 01/01: gnu: Add badass. |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jan 2018 06:54:09 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
address@hidden writes:
>>> Why do you think this belongs in Guix? Do you intend to use it
>>
>> So we do have Quality Standards for software that goes into Guix
>> now as in "you must be this tall to ride"? Didn't apply before
>> when other people sent in what I'd consider garbage.
>>
>> I'd be okay with keeping it outside of Guix in my own repos, so
>> go ahead and drop it for random reasons.
>
> Sorry, my reply was a bit too harsh. Here's another try:
>
> I don't have any ability to predict the taste of people.
> If we decline certain software entry into Guix, we should make it
> clear.. case by case? standards?
> Fyi I'm using this on github and other websites that make use of
> the activity graph.
>
> We do have software in our repository that I consider trash, so
> it's always subjective.
>
>>> yourself, or do you have reason to believe that Guix users would want
>>> this?
>>>
>>> There's a lot of garbage out there. Guix doesn't need to include every
>>> script that someone uploaded to github. Frankly, I'm embarrassed to
>>> have a package like this in Guix.
If a program was written and distributed with a free or open license,
then it's not a garbage for a writer at least. The purpose of usage
for everyone else could be different, maybe be a learning as example.
So, even if it's a simple script, but which somebody use and update, is
where a reason to block it? After all it's not breaking anything. :-)
Thanks,
Oleg.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature