[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OpenBLAS and performance
From: |
Dave Love |
Subject: |
Re: OpenBLAS and performance |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Dec 2017 12:24:32 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
>> I was confused. I see the only version of the library shipped is built
>> with pthreads. I think there should be serial, pthreads, and OpenMP
>> versions, as for Fedora.
>
> Do these library variants have the same binary interface, so that a user
> could simply preload one of them to override the default variant we use
> in the input graph of a given package?
Yes. You can use LD_LIBRARY_PATH as normal if you have variants with
the right soname, like the trivial shims in the example I referenced.
You probably want versions with the implementation-specific names too.
- Re: OpenBLAS and performance, (continued)
- Re: OpenBLAS and performance, Dave Love, 2017/12/22
- Re: OpenBLAS and performance, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/12/22
- Re: OpenBLAS and performance, Pjotr Prins, 2017/12/20
- Re: OpenBLAS and performance, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/12/20
- Re: OpenBLAS and performance, Pjotr Prins, 2017/12/21
- Re: OpenBLAS and performance, Eric Bavier, 2017/12/20
- Re: OpenBLAS and performance, Dave Love, 2017/12/21
- Re: OpenBLAS and performance, Dave Love, 2017/12/21
- Re: OpenBLAS and performance, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/12/21
- Re: OpenBLAS and performance, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/12/21
- Re: OpenBLAS and performance,
Dave Love <=
Re: OpenBLAS and performance, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/12/21