[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building from a local source code checkout
From: |
Konrad Hinsen |
Subject: |
Re: Building from a local source code checkout |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Dec 2017 18:02:29 +0100 |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I agree the matching-name constraint can be annoying. The alternative
> would be allow the user to (optionally?) specify the name of the package
> whose source is being changed, as in:
>
> guix build python-activepapers \
> --with-source=python-activepapers=$HOME/Dev/AP
>
> WDYT?
Looks much clearer to me. But, as you say, this could well be optional
if we can live with an ambiguity in the rare case of filenames containg
an equal sign.
Konrad.
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, (continued)
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/12/19
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Konrad Hinsen, 2017/12/20
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Konrad Hinsen, 2017/12/20
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Carlo Zancanaro, 2017/12/20
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Konrad Hinsen, 2017/12/21
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Pjotr Prins, 2017/12/21
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Martin Castillo, 2017/12/21
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/12/21
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Martin Castillo, 2017/12/21
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/12/22
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout,
Konrad Hinsen <=
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/12/22