[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gcc-ddc
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: gcc-ddc |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Dec 2017 15:48:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
Gábor Boskovits writes:
> Aside from these libtool files we can now say, that this ddc project
> succeeded.
Wait... The libtool's .la files are now the only files that show any
difference, even when gcc is compiled into it's own prefix? That's amazing!!!
> I've contacted the libtool developers if we can extend the wrapper approach
> to the .la files.
Great!
> It seems, that in some older version of libtool those were just sourced as
> shell script, but
> I don't know if now they do something more fancy with it or not...
> Anyways, if it's just shell script, then the environment variable approach
> can also work out there.
> The only problem seems, that I should do the substitution before checksumming
> the compiler.
> I think I can inject something into the makefile, or use a patched vesion of
> libtool.
>
> A patched libtool could be a better option, so other ddc projects can use it.
Indeed.
> I guess I can do something like add an environment variable
> GUIX_INSTALL_DIRECTORY, or something like that...
What's different about GUIX_INSTALL_DIRECTORY than the usual: PREFIX?
> Any maybe name this version libtool-for-ddc.
> It should be noted in the package documentation, that this package is not
> recommended for general use.
Are you proposing to patch libtool? If so, even if patching it for
[gcc-]dcc only would be a great hack for now. Please go forward with
that idea at least until libtool devs help us with a full solution.
janneke
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com
- Re: gcc-ddc, Gábor Boskovits, 2017/12/01
- Re: gcc-ddc,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=