[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add notmuch-vim.
From: |
Marius Bakke |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add notmuch-vim. |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jan 2017 20:20:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.23.5 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.1.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) |
ng0 <address@hidden> writes:
> Marius Bakke <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> ng0 <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Marius Bakke <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> ng0 <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> * gnu/packages/mail.scm (notmuch-vim): New variable.
>>>>
>>>> I think vim plugins should go in vim.scm, even if it relates to a
>>>> package residing elsewhere. Could you send an updated patch? TIA!
>>>
>>> I disagree. Then we should split up the notmuch emacs integration
>>> and move it into emacs.scm by the same logic.
>>
>> The emacs files are installed with the 'notmuch' package. If they are
>> split out, I would argue that they should go in emacs.scm as well.
>>
>> I don't see the point in that though, since they are less than 1MB and
>> do not carry any extra dependencies.
>
> With the vim removed from the inputs, I'd say this could be just
> another output?
>
> notmuch:vim
> notmuch:emacs
This seems fine to me, if it is possible to add propagation of
ruby-mail on a specific output. Otherwise we should use a proper package
declaration.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add notmuch-vim., Marius Bakke, 2017/01/14
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add notmuch-vim., ng0, 2017/01/14
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add notmuch-vim., Marius Bakke, 2017/01/15
- notmuch-vim ,v2, ng0, 2017/01/15
- [PATCH] gnu: Add notmuch-vim., ng0, 2017/01/15
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add notmuch-vim., Marius Bakke, 2017/01/15
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add notmuch-vim., ng0, 2017/01/15
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add notmuch-vim., Marius Bakke, 2017/01/15
- notmuch-vim, ruby-notmuch., ng0, 2017/01/16
- [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add ruby-notmuch., ng0, 2017/01/16