[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Editing Scheme in the installation image
From: |
Maxim Cournoyer |
Subject: |
Re: Editing Scheme in the installation image |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Jan 2017 14:44:58 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mike Gran <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> The functions expressed in Scheme in Zile-on-Guile are the same
>> as upstream Zile had. It is a fairly limited set.
>> Zile-on-Guile is a Scheme, not an elisp, even though the functions
>> it expresses have elisp-like names. So there is little portability
>> between Emacs and this Zile.
>
> Yes. Any idea how hard it would be to port the real Paredit to
> Zile-on-Guile?
Isn't there native support for elisp in Guile? Would this allow running
directly Paredit (elisp), provided that Zile-on-Guile implements
everything that Paredit needs from the Emacs API?
This is probably more work in the short term than rewriting Paredit in
Scheme, but it would enable Zile-on-Guile to potentially run (m)any Emacs
packages.
Maxim
- Editing Scheme in the installation image, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/01/05
- Re: Editing Scheme in the installation image, Kei Kebreau, 2017/01/05
- Re: Editing Scheme in the installation image, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/01/06
- Re: Editing Scheme in the installation image, Mike Gran, 2017/01/06
- Re: Editing Scheme in the installation image, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/01/07
- Re: Editing Scheme in the installation image,
Maxim Cournoyer <=
- Re: Editing Scheme in the installation image, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/01/08
- Re: Editing Scheme in the installation image, Mike Gran, 2017/01/08
- Re: Editing Scheme in the installation image, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/01/08
- Re: Editing Scheme in the installation image, Christopher Allan Webber, 2017/01/08
- Re: Editing Scheme in the installation image, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/01/09
Re: Editing Scheme in the installation image, Christopher Allan Webber, 2017/01/07