guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add capnproto.


From: Leo Famulari
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add capnproto.
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:17:23 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-07-23)

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 06:06:24PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 07:16:22PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> > Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> > 
> > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 07:48:36PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> > >> Note that it bundles googletest; I tried unbundling but it proved
> > >> difficult. gtest will no longer be used from the 0.6 release so I did
> > >> not think a comment was necessary.
> > >
> > > I am cc-ing Lukas with my reply, since he added our googletest package.
> > > Maybe he has some insight.
> > The problem is that their autotools system expects to build gtest as
> > well, so there are references all over. See:
> > https://github.com/sandstorm-io/capnproto/blob/release-0.5.3/c%2B%2B/Makefile.am
> > and also configure.ac. It would have to be patched out, which seems
> > excessive for a 4MB build dependency.
> 
> In my opinion, it's generally not about the size of the bundled
> dependency. Rather, it's about the opacity of the dependency graph of
> the application that does the bundling. The worst case would be
> something like a bundled OpenSSL, for example.
> 
> In this case, Debian has accepted the bundled gtest [0], which makes me
> wonder if my understanding of gtest is incorrect. Perhaps it is designed
> to be bundled?

In any case, since Debian accepted it, I'm willing to accept it as well,
unless somebody objects.

But the patch has gone stale due to other changes in serialization.scm.
Marius, will you send an updated patch?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]