[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: none
From: |
Jookia |
Subject: |
Re: none |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Jul 2016 17:47:56 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) |
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 02:35:41AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> It does not include your patches. I archived the messages that included
> your previously outstanding patches when you withdrew them from
> consideration. Many of your patches were to parts of the system that I
> don't understand. Readers of this list will recognize that I usually
> reply to package patches. That's basically the current limit of my
> knowledge.
I'm glad to hear that. It's interesting that you point this out, perhaps the
problem with my experiences I've had is that nobody wants to assign discussions
or the patches I've worked on to themselves? What should happen when nobody
wants to take up a patch or discussion?
- Re: none, (continued)
- Re: none, Pjotr Prins, 2016/07/21
- Re: none, Jookia, 2016/07/21
- Re: none, Leo Famulari, 2016/07/21
- Re: none, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Pjotr Prins, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Jookia, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Leo Famulari, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Jookia, 2016/07/24
- Re: none, Leo Famulari, 2016/07/24
- Re: none,
Jookia <=
- Re: none, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/07/24
- Re: none, Andreas Enge, 2016/07/24
- Re: none, Roel Janssen, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Leo Famulari, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Vincent Legoll, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, myglc2, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Tomáš Čech, 2016/07/23
- Review process, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/22
- Re: Review process, Pjotr Prins, 2016/07/22