[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: qt: monolithic or modular?
|
From: |
Efraim Flashner |
|
Subject: |
Re: qt: monolithic or modular? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 5 Jun 2016 13:24:23 +0300 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) |
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 11:15:59AM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 10:24:18AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > To be fair, it was only the arm build that took 3.5 hours, i686 and
> > x86_64 both took about an hour.
>
> What took 3,5 hours was the "evaluation" on hydra: The time between the
> moment I made hydra look at wip-qt, and the moment the first compilation
> of a package started, and this at a time where hydra had nothing else
> to do. So I do not think it makes sense to continue working in the wip-qt
> branch on hydra and to evaluate it ever so often, even more so since so far
> nothing depends on it and we will for the time being keep the monolithic
> qt-5; you may as well work locally as for other packages.
>
Ok, I wasn't aware that it took hydra that long to actually start
working on the next package set.
> By the way, dropping the examples made for a factor of 2 in the compilation
> time; a nice improvement!
>
> Andreas
>
--
Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature