[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Add libiax
From: |
Efraim Flashner |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Add libiax |
Date: |
Tue, 31 May 2016 20:40:53 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) |
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:25:55PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 02:50:02PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> > * gnu/packages/telephony.scm (libiax): New variable.
>
> > + (license lgpl2.0))))
>
> In my final review, I found that some source files are licensed under
> the GPL (no version specified) as well as one public-domain file. The
> details are in the attached patch revision.
>
> Since I don't understand the fine points of these things, I ask the
> group: can a source distribution be LGPL 2.0 and include GPL components?
I saw it explained another time that if the license is just "GPL" then
we can read it as we see fit, which usually means GPL3+ (for those
portions).
--
Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature