On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:59:14AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote:
John Darrington writes:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:14:59AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote:
> * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Rename texlive.scm to
tex.scm.
> * gnu/packages/texlive.scm: Rename file to tex.scm.
> * gnu/packages/tex.scm: Renamed from texlive.scm.
> * gnu/packages/algebra.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
> * gnu/packages/docbook.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
> * gnu/packages/engineering.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
> * gnu/packages/gettext.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
> * gnu/packages/gnome.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
> * gnu/packages/lisp.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
> * gnu/packages/maths.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
> * gnu/packages/music.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
> * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
> * gnu/packages/plotutils.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
> * gnu/packages/python.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
> * gnu/packages/scheme.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
>
> What is the purpose of doing that? I thought that texlive was
the chosen
> name that the project had.
>
> I think there are a few other implementations of TeX in the
wild (though
> mostly unmaintained). Furthermore, I think Knuth has a
trademark on the word "tex".
>
> J'
See this thread:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-05/msg00702.html
I want to add Texmaker (an editor for TeX). Putting it in
texlive.scm
wouldn't really fit because it's not part of Texlive. So, the
idea is
to put everything TeX-related into one file (tex.scm).
Oh I see. I thought you were renaming the package itself, not the
file in which
its definition resides (saying "Rename texlive.scm to tex.scm" would
have
made this clearer).