[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/9] gnu: Add ttfautohint.
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/9] gnu: Add ttfautohint. |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Apr 2016 23:40:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Bavier <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:13:47 +0300
> Alex Kost <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> address@hidden (2016-04-06 07:32 +0300) wrote:
[...]
>> > + (license license:gpl2+) ;or FreeType license
>>
>> Or FreeType? Sorry, what does it mean? If some files are under GPL2+
>> and some under FreeType, then why don't you use a list of licenses?
>>
>
> The license text says to pick one, and I wanted to indicate that in
> some way in the absense of more descriptive license operators.
You can use ‘list’ and indicate in a comment above that it’s up to the
recipient to choose one of these two licenses.
Ludo’.
- Re: [PATCH 1/9] gnu: Add ttfautohint., (continued)
- Re: [PATCH 1/9] gnu: Add ttfautohint., Eric Bavier, 2016/04/06
- Specifying package patches in a more convenient form, Alex Kost, 2016/04/07
- Re: Specifying package patches in a more convenient form, Andy Wingo, 2016/04/07
- Re: Specifying package patches in a more convenient form, Eric Bavier, 2016/04/07
- Re: Specifying package patches in a more convenient form, Alex Kost, 2016/04/08
- Re: Specifying package patches in a more convenient form, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/04/09
- Re: Specifying package patches in a more convenient form, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/04/07
- Re: Specifying package patches in a more convenient form, Alex Kost, 2016/04/09
- Re: Specifying package patches in a more convenient form, Andreas Enge, 2016/04/09
- Re: Specifying package patches in a more convenient form, Alex Kost, 2016/04/09
- Re: [PATCH 1/9] gnu: Add ttfautohint.,
Ludovic Courtès <=
Re: [PATCH 1/9] gnu: Add ttfautohint., Ludovic Courtès, 2016/04/13