guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] gnu: simple-scan: Update to 3.19.91.


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: simple-scan: Update to 3.19.91.
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 14:28:03 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Leo Famulari <address@hidden> skribis:

> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 08:39:37PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:25:04AM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
>> > On 09/03/2016, Leo Famulari <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > > [...] pass to ./configure '--disable-packagekit'. Would that work?
>> > 
>> > So do ‘we’:
>> > 
>> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:04:35PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
>> > > '(#:configure-flags '("--disable-packagekit")
>> 
>> Oops! Serves me right for trying to squeeze this review in earlier ;)
>> 
>> > There are various ways to code this, but none that don't amount to
>> > deleting (generated) source files.[1]
>> 
>> I didn't realize this was generated C code. In that case it's closer to
>> a compiled binary than source code, don't you think? Can we delete all
>> the generated files and rebuild them from source?
>
> Anyways, that is probably something to look into later. I think it makes
> sense to do this update, remove that file, and include a link to the bug
> report with a bit of context.
>
> Does anyone have any objections to that plan?

I’m not sure I fully grasped everything, but the plan looks good.  And
since it’s an update and the problem was already there, let’s not annoy
Tobias more than this.  :-)

Eventually, I agree it’ll be best to remove the generated C files,
though.

Ludo’.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]