guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: search-paths and propagated inputs


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: Re: search-paths and propagated inputs
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:35:10 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Federico Beffa <address@hidden> skribis:

> Federico Beffa <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the package 'gobject-introspection' declares a
>> search-path-specification for the variable GI_TYPELIB_PATH and
>> 'matplotlib' uses and propagates said package. I have 'matplotlib' in
>> my profile, but "guix package --search-paths" doesn't show anything
>> about GI_TYPELIB_PATH.
>>
>> Is it intentional or an oversight that search-path-specifications of
>> propagated-inputs are not considered? Or, am I doing something wrong?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Fede
>
> Bug or feature?

Sorry to reply to a months-old message…  and thanks for waiting.  :-)

What you describe above would be a bug, but it seems there’s no longer
any such bug:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
scheme@(guile-user)> ,m (gnu packages python)
scheme@(gnu packages python)> (package-search-paths python-matplotlib)
$2 = ()
scheme@(gnu packages python)> (package-transitive-native-search-paths 
python-matplotlib)
$3 = (#<<search-path-specification> variable: "GI_TYPELIB_PATH" files: 
("lib/girepository-1.0") separator: ":" file-type: directory file-pattern: #f> 
#<<search-path-specification> variable: "PYTHONPATH" files: 
("lib/python3.4/site-packages") separator: ":" file-type: directory 
file-pattern: #f> #<<search-path-specification> variable: "GUIX_GTK3_PATH" 
files: ("lib/gtk-3.0") separator: ":" file-type: directory file-pattern: #f> 
#<<search-path-specification> variable: "XDG_DATA_DIRS" files: ("share") 
separator: ":" file-type: directory file-pattern: #f> 
#<<search-path-specification> variable: "GIO_EXTRA_MODULES" files: 
("lib/gio/modules") separator: ":" file-type: directory file-pattern: #f>)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Could you confirm?

Ludo’.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]