[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Installing headers to a separate output?
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: Installing headers to a separate output? |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Feb 2016 21:40:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:32:22PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Other distributions have separate “*-devel” or “*-dev” packages (and I’m
> ambivalent about this) — would it be a bad idea if we provided “devel”
> or “dev” *outputs* so that users had more control over what ends up in
> their store?
Personally I find this really annoying and am happy that we just install
a package (most of the time) as the result of "make install". Otherwise,
we would also almost systematically need to add the header outputs as
build inputs.
Andreas
- Installing headers to a separate output?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/02/25
- Re: Installing headers to a separate output?,
Andreas Enge <=
- Re: Installing headers to a separate output?, Efraim Flashner, 2016/02/25
- Re: Installing headers to a separate output?, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/02/26
- Re: Installing headers to a separate output?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/02/27
- Re: Installing headers to a separate output?, Pjotr Prins, 2016/02/27
- git download size, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/02/28
- Re: git download size, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/02/28
- Re: git download size, Pjotr Prins, 2016/02/28
- Re: git download size, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/02/28