[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Staying on top of Qt security
|
From: |
Andreas Enge |
|
Subject: |
Re: Staying on top of Qt security |
|
Date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:59:38 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 02:53:40PM -0800, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> I'm assuming this was directed at me (though I don't work on Pumpa, but
> I could ask the author things... I do *use* it every day though). What
> am I being asked here... I'm not sure? Whether Pumpa could be updated
> to QT 5?
I think so :-)
The alternative question would have been whether we could remove it,
but I already knew the answer...
Andreas
- Staying on top of Qt security, Leo Famulari, 2016/02/14
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Andreas Enge, 2016/02/18
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Leo Famulari, 2016/02/18
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/02/18
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security,
Andreas Enge <=
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/02/20
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Leo Famulari, 2016/02/21
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/02/21
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Leo Famulari, 2016/02/21
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Andreas Enge, 2016/02/22
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Leo Famulari, 2016/02/22
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Andreas Enge, 2016/02/22
Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Andreas Enge, 2016/02/22
Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Andreas Enge, 2016/02/25