[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Add and use sqlite-legacy-for-python
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Add and use sqlite-legacy-for-python |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Feb 2016 08:59:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 04:13:52PM -0800, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> +(define-public sqlite-legacy-for-python
> + (version "3.8.11.1")
in line with other cases where we package several versions, I would simply
call this sqlite-3.8.
Maybe it could be a simple "define" instead of "define-public", assuming
it would effectively be used only as in input inside the python module?
(Then it would need to be placed in the same module, of course.)
Andreas
- sqlite update causes failure of python-sqlalchemy, Pjotr Prins, 2016/02/08
- Re: sqlite update causes failure of python-sqlalchemy, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/02/09
- [PATCH] Add and use sqlite-legacy-for-python, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/02/12
- Re: [PATCH] Add and use sqlite-legacy-for-python, Thompson, David, 2016/02/12
- Re: [PATCH] Add and use sqlite-legacy-for-python, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/02/12
- Re: [PATCH] Add and use sqlite-legacy-for-python, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/02/14
- Re: [PATCH] Add and use sqlite-legacy-for-python, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/02/15
- Re: [PATCH] Add and use sqlite-legacy-for-python, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/02/15
- Re: [PATCH] Add and use sqlite-legacy-for-python, Pjotr Prins, 2016/02/15
- Re: [PATCH] Add and use sqlite-legacy-for-python, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/02/21
- Re: [PATCH] Add and use sqlite-legacy-for-python,
Andreas Enge <=