[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add eSpeak
|
From: |
Andreas Enge |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add eSpeak |
|
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:48:18 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:58:12AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> So, in the future we should probably
> package espeak-ng as well, for the sake of users that need speech
> synthesis. It will conflict with espeak since the output binaries have
> the same names.
>From what you write, would it not be better to directly package espeak-ng
and to drop espeak?
Andreas
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add espeak., (continued)
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add espeak., Ludovic Courtès, 2016/01/15
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add espeak., Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/01/14
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add espeak., Ludovic Courtès, 2016/01/14
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add espeak., Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/01/17
- PulseAudio & ALSA, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/01/17
[PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add sonic., Leo Famulari, 2016/01/12
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add eSpeak, Leo Famulari, 2016/01/12
PulseAudio, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/01/13