[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/1] Move cursynth to music.scm
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/1] Move cursynth to music.scm |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Dec 2015 00:33:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:
> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 05:17:15PM -0600, Eric Bavier wrote:
>>> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:09:09 -0500
>>> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I think it would be better for this software synthesizer to be in
>>> > music.scm.
>>> >
>>> > Thoughts?
>>>
>>> IIRC, the original thought was that many GNU packages have their own
>>> modules, so this was done for cursynth as well.
>>
>> Okay, sure.
>
> I think it would be nice to have cursynth in “music.scm”.
+1
>> To be honest, I don't understand the reasoning behind grouping packages
>> into modules. Is it just for humans or is there some technical reason
>> for it?
>
> It’s mostly for humans AFAIU. Personally, I prefer try to avoid a
> proliferation of one-off modules; maybe because I don’t like the
> boilerplate (license header, module definition with imports, adding the
> module to “gnu-system.am”).
Same here.
More modules also lead to more I/O for the various commands.
Ludo’.
- [PATCH 0/1] Move cursynth to music.scm, Leo Famulari, 2015/12/28
- [PATCH 1/1] gnu: Move cursynth to (gnu packages music)., Leo Famulari, 2015/12/28
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] Move cursynth to music.scm, Eric Bavier, 2015/12/28
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] Move cursynth to music.scm, Leo Famulari, 2015/12/28
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] Move cursynth to music.scm, Ricardo Wurmus, 2015/12/29
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] Move cursynth to music.scm, Alex Kost, 2015/12/29
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] Move cursynth to music.scm, Leo Famulari, 2015/12/29
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] Move cursynth to music.scm,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] Move cursynth to music.scm, Leo Famulari, 2015/12/29
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] Move cursynth to music.scm, Leo Famulari, 2015/12/30