[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add manaplus.
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add manaplus. |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Oct 2015 23:56:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
"Thompson, David" <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Alex Kost <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>>> I don't know if there is a better workaround for the SDL headers, but
>>> this problem is rather common: there is a workaround in 'abbaye' and a
>>> special patch for 'pingus'.
>>>
>>> The problem is: the source code has lines like this:
>>>
>>> #include <SDL_mixer.h>
>>>
>>> but the headers of all SDL packages are placed in “include/SDL/”
>>> subdirectories. And an upstream often doesn't use "pkg-config" for
>>> every SDL package to define CFLAGS and assumes that all SDL headers are
>>> placed in one directory. So we have to invent workarounds for such
>>> packages.
>>>
>>> I just mention this problem here, perhaps someone will come up with a
>>> general solution.
>>
>> Can’t ‘sdl-union’ be used here? I think it was created specifically to
>> solve this problem. (Currently it’s private to (gnu packages sdl) but
>> you can export it.)
>
> Do you have any concerns about this package being picked up by UIs now
> that it will be public? Might confuse a user or two, dunno.
No opinion. If you think we’d rather keep it hidden, we can wrap it in
a thunk for instance so that the UIs don’t pick it up. WDYT?
Ludo’.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add manaplus., Alex Kost, 2015/10/10
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add manaplus., Ludovic Courtès, 2015/10/11
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add manaplus., Alex Kost, 2015/10/12
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add manaplus., Ludovic Courtès, 2015/10/12
- [PATCH] gnu: abbaye: Use 'sdl-union'., Alex Kost, 2015/10/13
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: abbaye: Use 'sdl-union'., Thompson, David, 2015/10/13
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: abbaye: Use 'sdl-union'., Alex Kost, 2015/10/14