Re: [PATCH] xscreenshot and imagefile

[Mark H Weaver]

Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:
> Do other people think that such programs belong in Guix?

Okay, it seems that the general feeling is that we should accept these
programs, so I'll go along with that.  I guess I should apologize for
making you feel unwelcome.  My social skills leave much to be desired.

Anyway, the remaining issues to resolve are:

* You should add your copyright notice to suckless.scm.

* The version numbers should not be 1.0 unless there is either a tarball
  release or a tag in the git repo that marks this commit as being
  version 1.0.  If there are no tarball releases and no tags, then the
  version strings should probably be of the form "YYYYMMDD.<commit>".
  Putting the date in front is important so that version numbers can be
  compared correctly by the "guix package -u" command.

* As Alex pointed out, the license on 'xscreenshot' is actually the
  expat license, not the X11 license, so the license field needs to be
  fixed.

* As Alex pointed out, the description lines should be wrapped to keep
  the sources within 80 columns.

Would you like to send updated patches?

     Mark