Re: [PATCH] Add prodigal.

[Alex Kost]

Ben Woodcroft (2015-07-05 07:52 +0300) wrote:

> On 27/06/15 22:33, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
>> To me this is problematic in two ways:
>> 1. It works on more than just genomes
>> 2. There is some contention in the field about the use of
>> "prokaryote", since this refers to a paraphyletic group - us humans
>> are more closely related to Archaea than Bacteria.
>> http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-642-30194-0_114
>>
>> I figure it was just easier to sidestep the issue and put Archaea and
>> Bacteria.
> Perhaps I bored everyone, but is the patch a-ok now?

I've tried it and it has been built successfully, and I think it's
absolutely OK.  I have not pushed it though as Ricardo is a Master of
bioinformatics, perhaps he'll notice something I didn't.

-- 
Alex