[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs packages
From: |
Federico Beffa |
Subject: |
Re: emacs packages |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Jun 2015 21:31:20 +0200 |
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> wrote:
> FYI, this pattern of using 'fold' with 'and' and a boolean seed would be
> more transparent if handled by 'every' from (srfi srfi-1):
>
> (every (lambda (f)
> (zero? (system* emacs "--batch" "-Q" "-L" el-dir
> "-f" "batch-byte-compile" f)))
> (find-files "." "\\.el$"))
Thanks for the comment. I saw the form 'every' in the past, but 'fold'
always come first to my mind. Probably because it took me more
neurons to understand how to use it :-)
> However, this won't be needed here if you use 'emacs-batch-eval' or add
> 'emacs-byte-compile' as suggested by Ludovic, which I agree is the right
> approach.
What do you think about the attached implementation?
Thanks,
Fede
0001-build-emacs-utils-Add-emacs-byte-compile.patch
Description: Text Data
- Re: emacs packages, (continued)
- Re: emacs packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/06/19
- Re: emacs packages, Federico Beffa, 2015/06/19
- Re: emacs packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/06/21
- Re: emacs packages, Federico Beffa, 2015/06/22
- Re: emacs packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/06/22
- Re: emacs packages, Federico Beffa, 2015/06/23
- Re: emacs packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/06/23
Re: emacs packages, Mark H Weaver, 2015/06/16
- Re: emacs packages,
Federico Beffa <=