[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 01/02: gnu: slurm: Update to 20.11.2.
From: |
Vincent Legoll |
Subject: |
Re: 01/02: gnu: slurm: Update to 20.11.2. |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Jan 2021 09:37:08 +0100 |
Hello,
here it is : in issue 45670
I added back the old 20.02 version, updated to its latest patch level,
from 20.02.5-1 to 20.02.6-1.
Is that OK ?
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 12:12 AM Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:
>
>
> guix-commits@gnu.org writes:
>
> > lfam pushed a commit to branch master
> > in repository guix.
> >
> > commit 50abaf63879c93e0ea0e09883defe639396fb04c
> > Author: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>
> > AuthorDate: Tue Dec 29 12:37:21 2020 +0100
> >
> > gnu: slurm: Update to 20.11.2.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/parallel.scm (slurm): Update to 20.11.2.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
>
> A comment right under the package says this:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> ;; The SLURM client/daemon protocol and file format changes from time to time
> ;; in incompatible ways, as noted in
> ;; <https://slurm.schedmd.com/troubleshoot.html#network>. Thus, keep older
> ;; releases here. See also <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/44387>.
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Does it make sense to keep the previous release?
>
>
> --
> Ricardo
--
Vincent Legoll
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: 01/02: gnu: slurm: Update to 20.11.2.,
Vincent Legoll <=