[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
05/05: packages: Delete duplicate inputs when lowering bags.
From: |
guix-commits |
Subject: |
05/05: packages: Delete duplicate inputs when lowering bags. |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:06:43 -0400 (EDT) |
civodul pushed a commit to branch core-updates
in repository guix.
commit 6b4663363c061071c10209f71aed1017a241af6c
Author: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
AuthorDate: Thu Oct 15 23:01:57 2020 +0200
packages: Delete duplicate inputs when lowering bags.
This is a followup to 18fa433bf5c420868562b9f4b017c5c97251a44b and
<https://issues.guix.gnu.org/43508>.
* guix/packages.scm (derivation=?, input=?): New procedures.
(bag->derivation, bag->cross-derivation): Add calls to
'delete-duplicates'.
* tests/packages.scm ("package-derivation, inputs deduplicated"): New
test.
---
guix/packages.scm | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
tests/packages.scm | 13 +++++++++++++
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/guix/packages.scm b/guix/packages.scm
index 865cb81..5ad27fa 100644
--- a/guix/packages.scm
+++ b/guix/packages.scm
@@ -1322,6 +1322,22 @@ TARGET."
(bag (package->bag package system target)))
(bag-grafts store bag)))
+(define-inlinable (derivation=? drv1 drv2)
+ "Return true if DRV1 and DRV2 are equal."
+ (or (eq? drv1 drv2)
+ (string=? (derivation-file-name drv1)
+ (derivation-file-name drv2))))
+
+(define (input=? input1 input2)
+ "Return true if INPUT1 and INPUT2 are equivalent."
+ (match input1
+ ((label1 drv1 . outputs1)
+ (match input2
+ ((label2 drv2 . outputs2)
+ (and (string=? label1 label2)
+ (equal? outputs1 outputs2)
+ (derivation=? drv1 drv2)))))))
+
(define* (bag->derivation store bag
#:optional context)
"Return the derivation to build BAG for SYSTEM. Optionally, CONTEXT can be
@@ -1340,9 +1356,12 @@ error reporting."
p))
(_ '()))
inputs))))
-
+ ;; It's possible that INPUTS contains packages that are not 'eq?' but
+ ;; that lead to the same derivation. Delete those duplicates to avoid
+ ;; issues down the road, such as duplicate entries in '%build-inputs'.
(apply (bag-build bag)
- store (bag-name bag) input-drvs
+ store (bag-name bag)
+ (delete-duplicates input-drvs input=?)
#:search-paths paths
#:outputs (bag-outputs bag) #:system system
(bag-arguments bag)))))
@@ -1380,8 +1399,9 @@ This is an internal procedure."
(apply (bag-build bag)
store (bag-name bag)
- #:native-drvs build-drvs
- #:target-drvs (append host-drvs target-drvs)
+ #:native-drvs (delete-duplicates build-drvs input=?)
+ #:target-drvs (delete-duplicates (append host-drvs target-drvs)
+ input=?)
#:search-paths paths
#:native-search-paths npaths
#:outputs (bag-outputs bag)
diff --git a/tests/packages.scm b/tests/packages.scm
index cbd0503..2649c24 100644
--- a/tests/packages.scm
+++ b/tests/packages.scm
@@ -611,6 +611,19 @@
(and (derivation? drv)
(file-exists? (derivation-file-name drv)))))
+(test-assert "package-derivation, inputs deduplicated"
+ (let* ((dep (dummy-package "dep"))
+ (p0 (dummy-package "p" (inputs `(("dep" ,dep)))))
+ (p1 (package (inherit p0)
+ (inputs `(("dep" ,(package (inherit dep)))
+ ,@(package-inputs p0))))))
+ ;; Here P1 ends up with two non-eq? copies of DEP, under the same label.
+ ;; They should be deduplicated so that P0 and P1 lead to the same
+ ;; derivation rather than P1 ending up with duplicate entries in its
+ ;; '%build-inputs' variable.
+ (string=? (derivation-file-name (package-derivation %store p0))
+ (derivation-file-name (package-derivation %store p1)))))
+
(test-assert "package-output"
(let* ((package (dummy-package "p"))
(drv (package-derivation %store package)))