[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 64-bit Guile on Windows
From: |
Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide |
Subject: |
Re: 64-bit Guile on Windows |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:07:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.6.11; emacs 28.1 |
Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 49E3EE22191725EE created at
> 2022-06-28T18:14:22+0200 using EDDSA]]
> Thomas Thiriez via General Guile related discussions schreef op di 28-
> 06-2022 om 16:41 [+0200]:
>> Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> writes:
>>
>> > Le 27/06/2022 à 15:56, Thomas Thiriez via General Guile related
>> > discussions a écrit :
>> [...]
>> > > (* 999 999 999) -> -76738825
>> [...]
>> >
>> > We had exactly the same problem at LilyPond, and this was the
>> > fix:
>> >
>> > https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/blob/master/release/binaries/lib/dependencies.py#L721
>> >
>> > Namely, you need to patch libguile/conv-integer.i.c and
>> > conv-uinteger.i.c to replace "SIZEOF_TYPE < SIZEOF_SCM_T_BITS"
>> > with "SIZEOF_TYPE < SIZEOF_LONG".
>> >
>> > HTH,
>> > Jean
>>
>> Thanks for the info. I have tried this, but it doesn't appear to
>> be helping.
>>
>> I did a few tests with lilypond, and here is what I found. I have
>> a test.scm file containing:
>>
>> (display (* 999)) (newline)
>> (display (* 999 999)) (newline)
>> (display (* 999 999 999)) (newline)
>>
>> lilypond.exe -e '(load \"test.scm\")' test.ly
>> GNU LilyPond 2.23.10 (running Guile 2.2)
>> 999
>> 998001
>> 997002999
>>
>> That is fine. Now, if I try compiling test.scm to test.go, I get:
>>
>> lilypond.exe -e '(use-modules (system base compile))(compile-file
>> \"test.scm\" #:output-file \"test.go\")' test.ly
>> GNU LilyPond 2.23.10 (running Guile 2.2)
>> ice-9/boot-9.scm:752:25: In procedure dispatch-exception:
>> In procedure bytevector-u64-set!: Value out of range: -149659645
>
> Possibly fixnum-related, so maybe:
>
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=42060
>
> Maybe 32-bit <-> 64-bit related, so maybe:
>
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=28920
>
> Also, guile@2.2 is not developed anymore AFAICT.
From what I see, Guile 2.2 does still get fixes, but no larger changes.
See https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/log/?h=stable-2.2
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature