Re: Can guile be implementation independent?

[Nala Ginrut]

I'm not sure about the complete incompatibles between Guile and r7rs. To my
experience, the  exception handling is different from r7rs.
I think Scheme community has great progress these years, so many features
are covered by the standard, include FFI(srfi-198),
delimited-continuation(srfi-226), etc.
Guile provides rich features, but people may need to write wrapper for the
standard API.

Best regards.

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021, 11:01 Jacob Hrbek <kreyren@rixotstudio.cz> wrote:

> Looks interesting, are there any known limitations in relation to Guile?
> On 12/17/21 03:53, Nala Ginrut wrote:
>
> Hi Jacob!
> You may take a look at akku.scm
> You can write r7rs code and use Guile as one of the compiler alternatives.
>
> Best regards.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021, 09:43 Jacob Hrbek <kreyren@rixotstudio.cz> wrote:
>
>> I am used to working with common lisp where i can write code that is
>> "implementation independent" meaning that following a specific coding
>> style makes it compatible across multiple interpretators/compilers
>> (sbcl, LispWorks, etc..)
>>
>> Is there a way to do the same on GNU Guile? Like writing a code that can
>> be interpreted by implementations that are following the IEEE 1178-2008
>> or R7RS standard?
>>
>> -- Jacob Hrbek
>>
>> --
> -- Jacob Hrbek
>
>