[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: parse-result (Catonano)
From: |
Zelphir Kaltstahl |
Subject: |
Re: Re: parse-result (Catonano) |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jan 2019 21:31:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 |
Perhaps I should put a link into the source code whenever I follow a
tutorial. Sorry for the confusion!
I am also only following Amirouche Boubekki's tutorial ; ) Good that you
already found it.
There is a paper about parser combinators (which I did not completely
implement, because I had a bug somewhere, where I did not find it at
some point), about parser combinators:
http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/~pszgmh/monparsing.pdf
It takes some time to get used to the Gopher code syntax, but from the
part of the paper, that I read, it is quite clever stuff, all this
parser combinator stuff.
I am still unsure about the theoretical CS stuff: What kind of parsers
one can possibly write with parser combinators? Which language class is
that? I have language X can I parse it completely using parser
combinators? etc. Theoretical CS and the proofs were not my strongest area.
On 1/16/19 6:00 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> Ok I found this
>
> https://hyperdev.fr/blog/getting-started-with-guile-parser-combinators.html
- Re: Re: parse-result (Catonano),
Zelphir Kaltstahl <=
- Re: Re: parse-result (Catonano), tomas, 2019/01/16
- Re: Re: parse-result (Catonano), swedebugia, 2019/01/17
- Re: Re parse-result, Zelphir Kaltstahl, 2019/01/17
- Re: Re parse-result, swedebugia, 2019/01/17
- Re: Re parse-result, tomas, 2019/01/17
- Re: Re parse-result, Zelphir Kaltstahl, 2019/01/19
- Re: Re parse-result, tomas, 2019/01/20
- Re: Re: Re parse-result, Zelphir Kaltstahl, 2019/01/20
- Re: Re parse-result, John Cowan, 2019/01/17