[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: help : call function with args
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: help : call function with args |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Apr 2018 16:39:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 09:43:18AM +0200, calcium wrote:
> Sorry, I tried to use a disposable email web service, but it didn’t
> work, so I just created a email account.
No problem. And despite your second mail, this one does arrive
as plain text: all seems well :-)
> The question was how to do what I intended with this code (sorry I don’t
> know how to express this with words) :
>
>
> (define (f a b c d)
>
> (+ a b c d))
>
>
> (f 1 (values 2 3) 4)
Hm. I don't think "values" does what you expect it to do.
(Please, more seasoned Schemers help out if I'm talking
nonsense)
Thing is that the "slot" (which I'll represent as "#") in
(f 1 # 4)
just expects *one* value. And multiple value returns (as
returned by "values" are built to only yield one value when
expected to do so (the first one), so your code will "see"
(f 1 2 4)
and complain that you're "holding" f "wrong". If you want
to build a function taking multiple values you'll have to
use "call-with-values".
I think you'll find it easier to reason first about an f
which takes as many args as your conditionals produce, so
you won't be struggling to splice your "bunch of values"
into a bigger argument list.
For example (using list here, but could use multiple values
too):
(define weather 'fine)
(define (mood)
(if (eq weather 'fine)
(list "very" "good")
(list "pretty" "bad")))
(apply string-append (mood))
=> "verygood"
(set! weather 'so-so)
(apply string-append (mood))
=> "prettybad"
Is that the direction you are trying to take?
Cheers
- -- t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlrE47wACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYPBwCfTxPUCELmJz67+luFK4e0s2il
ExsAnjdUCxW1atS5ojsv+Rqm9XkBO+aI
=sWuA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----