[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile bugs
From: |
Nala Ginrut |
Subject: |
Re: Guile bugs |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:39:48 +0800 |
Hi folks!
Now that we all have such need, why bother to polish the nasty REPL way for
remote execution?
Let's discuss serializable-continuations which I always expect very much!
2017年9月20日 上午4:38,"Chris Vine" <address@hidden>写道:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 21:18:40 +0100
> Chris Vine <address@hidden> wrote:
> > ... Ports are also not thread safe (rightly so in my view), and I
> > believe that extends to the global stdout and stdin ports.
>
> By that I mean that any one port object is not thread safe against
> concurrent use by two or more different threads, without external
> synchronization.
>
>
- Re: Guile bugs, (continued)
- Re: Guile bugs, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/09/10
- Re: Guile bugs, Linas Vepstas, 2017/09/10
- Re: Guile bugs, Linas Vepstas, 2017/09/14
- Re: Guile bugs, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/09/15
- Re: Guile bugs, Linas Vepstas, 2017/09/19
- Re: Guile bugs, Chris Vine, 2017/09/19
- Re: Guile bugs, Chris Vine, 2017/09/19
- Re: Guile bugs,
Nala Ginrut <=
Re: Guile bugs, Linas Vepstas, 2017/09/09