[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: primitive eval with module => Unbound variable?
From: |
Vladimir Zhbanov |
Subject: |
Re: primitive eval with module => Unbound variable? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 May 2017 20:58:42 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:59:01PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> My Mescc C compiler produces from C
>
> int main () {return 0;}
>
> a list of functions (lambdas), that are called with text-address,
> data-address, globals, functions to produce lists of x86 instructions:
>
> #<procedure 2a61a80 at ice-9/eval.scm:345:13 (a b c d e)>
> => (85 137 229 131 236 64)
> #<procedure 2a859c0 at ice-9/eval.scm:345:13 (a b c d e)>
> => (184 0 0 0 0)
> #<procedure 2aada20 at ice-9/eval.scm:345:13 (a b c d e)>
> => (80)
> #<procedure 2ace560 at ice-9/eval.scm:345:13 (a b c d e)>
> ...
>
> I hoped to instead produce intermediate results in a sexp that can be
> written to file (like .o object files). So instead of evaluating
> the lambdas, I tried quoting them to now produce
>
> ==>
>
> (lambda (f g ta t d) (list 85 137 229 131 236 64))
> (lambda (f g ta t d) (list 184 0 0 0 0))
> (lambda (f g ta t d) (list 80))
> (lambda (f g ta t d) (i386:push-global-address (+ (data-offset
> "s:scaffold/mesmes" g) d)))
> ...
>
> and primitive-eval and run them later.... However, when I do this,
> i386:push-global-address is an Unbound variable. Here's a small test
> that demonstrates my problem
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> ;; this works without define-module:
> ;; guile -e 'main' -s foo.scm
>
> ;; uncomment define-module below and run:
> ;; guile -e '(@ (foo) main)' -s foo.scm
> ;; => ERROR: Unbound variable: bar
> ;; (define-module (foo) #:export (main))
>
> (define (bar) (display "bar!!!\n"))
>
> (define foo '(lambda (x) (bar)))
>
> (define (main . rest)
> (let ()
> (format (current-error-port) "eval: foo=~s\n" foo)
> (let ((x (primitive-eval foo)))
> (format (current-error-port) " =>~s\n" x)
> (x 0))))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> This code works when not put in a module; make it a module and I get
>
> => ERROR: Unbound variable: bar
>
> What should I be doing differently?
>
I've found two working variants:
First:
--------------------------------8<--------------------------------
(define-module (foo) #:export (main)) ; this is as is
...
(define foo '(lambda (x) ((@@ (foo) bar))))
...
-------------------------------->8--------------------------------
Second:
--------------------------------8<--------------------------------
(define-module (foo) #:export (main bar)) ; export bar
...
(define foo '(lambda (x) ((@ (foo) bar))))
...
-------------------------------->8--------------------------------
It seems bar is not exported when guile tries to eval (compile?)
the code. Should it compile it here?
--
Vladimir