[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Transient environment with standard functions
From: |
Blanka Herono |
Subject: |
Re: Transient environment with standard functions |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Jul 2016 21:20:05 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 |
Why do you think Sussman et al's. propagator don't solve OP problem?
I don't think Basa was saying this, exactly.
I think Basa meant using something like Matt Keeter's project:
https://www.mattkeeter.com/projects/ao/
https://www.mattkeeter.com/projects/ao/screencast.html [video]
(which is a functional CAD modeling system using C++/Guile) as a backend
(graphical kernel) for a
propagator network which solves engineering constraints.
The reason Basa said it was a ways off is that the propagator code is in MIT
Scheme. That would
mean either the code for the propagator would have to be ported or the code for
Ao would be.
Ao itself is a nice project done in Guile, like OpenSCAD using Guile as a
language. Another
valid issue Basa revisited is that there would probably need to be sandboxing
or a declarative
language layer to use Ao for security with shared models. This issue was
discussed a while back
on this mailing list.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Transient environment with standard functions,
Blanka Herono <=