[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Need for scm_remember_upto_here_* in guile-2.0
From: |
Chris Vine |
Subject: |
Re: Need for scm_remember_upto_here_* in guile-2.0 |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:48:38 +0100 |
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:35:09 +0100
Chris Vine <address@hidden> wrote:
> I think you were trying to answer my question, which was: "... is the
> point that the scm_remember_upto_here_* functions are in practice only
> needed for smobs which provide their own free function?" (that is,
> which have no finalisers). I think you were giving the answer "Yes".
Err, "... which have finalisers".
Assuming this is the case, the guile manual example is rather unhelpful.
- Need for scm_remember_upto_here_* in guile-2.0, Chris Vine, 2015/09/12
- Re: Need for scm_remember_upto_here_* in guile-2.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/09/22
- Re: Need for scm_remember_upto_here_* in guile-2.0, David Kastrup, 2015/09/22
- Re: Need for scm_remember_upto_here_* in guile-2.0, Mark H Weaver, 2015/09/22
- Re: Need for scm_remember_upto_here_* in guile-2.0, David Kastrup, 2015/09/22
- Re: Need for scm_remember_upto_here_* in guile-2.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/09/22
- Re: Need for scm_remember_upto_here_* in guile-2.0, Chris Vine, 2015/09/22
- Re: Need for scm_remember_upto_here_* in guile-2.0,
Chris Vine <=
- Re: Need for scm_remember_upto_here_* in guile-2.0, David Kastrup, 2015/09/23
- Re: Need for scm_remember_upto_here_* in guile-2.0, Chris Vine, 2015/09/23
- Re: Need for scm_remember_upto_here_* in guile-2.0, David Kastrup, 2015/09/23
- Re: Need for scm_remember_upto_here_* in guile-2.0, Chris Vine, 2015/09/23
- Re: Need for scm_remember_upto_here_* in guile-2.0, David Kastrup, 2015/09/23
- Re: Need for scm_remember_upto_here_* in guile-2.0, Chris Vine, 2015/09/23