[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: help with foldts*-values from (sxml fold) ?
From: |
Matt Wette |
Subject: |
Re: help with foldts*-values from (sxml fold) ? |
Date: |
Mon, 11 May 2015 20:36:15 -0700 |
I discovered that the return values for fd (aka fdown) should include one
additional value (three in this case, not two).
On May 10, 2015, at 7:46 PM, Matt Wette <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to learn to use sxml currently having issues with foldts*-values.
> I can't find specification of the function signatures. I do have Andy
> Wingo's paper. When I feed a tree to the routine consol-runs-3 below I get
> error regarding number of args to fh. call signature for fh? Any clue what
> I've got wrong? -- Matt
>
> (define (consol-runs-3 s0)
> (letrec (;; fd: node seed ...
> (fd (lambda (node seed vars)
> (values node vars)))
> ;; fu: node seed ...
> (fu (lambda (node seed vars kseed kvars)
> (values seed vars)))
> ;; fh: atom seed ...
> (fh (lambda (atom seed vars)
> (values atom vars)))
> )
> (foldts*-values fd fu fh s0 '() '())))
>
> In sxml/fold.scm:
> 104: 2 [foldts*-values #<procedure fd (node seed vars)> ...]
> 89: 1 [fold-values #<procedure 104e4d0f0 at sxml/fold.scm:105:23 (tree .
> seeds)> ...]
> In /.../dvP4.scm:
> 21: 0 [fh elt ()]
>
> /.../dvP4.scm:21:15: In procedure fh:
> /.../dvP4.scm:21:15: Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure fh (atom seed
> vars)>
>
>
>