[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile 2.0 interpretation vs compilation
|
From: |
Marko Rauhamaa |
|
Subject: |
Re: Guile 2.0 interpretation vs compilation |
|
Date: |
Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:33:55 +0300 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Mark H Weaver <address@hidden>:
> This is expected but not ideal. Our primitive evaluator does not
> preserve non-toplevel variable names, and therefore the associated
> procedure names are lost. Maybe we can fix this in Guile 2.2.
I noticed the issue because I have software that depends on the
procedure-name of inner functions. I can live with this guile-2.0 quirk
if it is considered a guile defect. However, if the semantics of
procedure-name of inner functions is unspecified, I'll have to look at
refactoring my code.
Marko