[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Aug 2013 23:32:40 +0300 |
> From: Mark H Weaver <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:50:34 -0400
>
> Well, that's not generally how things are done on POSIX systems
As I said, some GNU projects already do that. GCC and GDB are two
examples.
> furthermore I don't see how this could be made to work reliably on
> POSIX.
It's true that this is not 100% bulletproof on Posix, but it's close.
And when it doesn't work, we didn't lose anything, we are just back to
where we are now, right?
- Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel, (continued)
- Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel, Mark H Weaver, 2013/08/25
- Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/25
- Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/25
- Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel, Mark H Weaver, 2013/08/25
- Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel, dsmich, 2013/08/25
- Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/25
- Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel, Mark H Weaver, 2013/08/26
- Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel, Mark H Weaver, 2013/08/26
- Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/26
- Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/25
- Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/08/25
- Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel, Mark H Weaver, 2013/08/25
- Re: guile-2.0 on mingw: the sequel, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/25