[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clis
From: |
白い熊 |
Subject: |
Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:28:52 +0400 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
Nala Ginrut <address@hidden> wrote:
>you may try:
>(with-output-to-string (lambda () (apropos "guile")))
>you're so lucky that "with-output-to-string" appears in clisp, but I'm
>not familiar with elisp
Very close I think, it exists in elisp too, however
(with-output-to-string (lambda () (apropos "clisp")))
is true in guile and there is no way to test equality with "" using =
So how do I determine the string is empty with lisp equivalent code? Can't use
equal? because it doesn't exist in lisp...
--
白い熊
- Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, 白い熊, 2013/07/29
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Nala Ginrut, 2013/07/29
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, 白い熊, 2013/07/29
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Nala Ginrut, 2013/07/30
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, 白い熊, 2013/07/31
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Nala Ginrut, 2013/07/31
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Nala Ginrut, 2013/07/31
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs,
白い熊 <=
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Nala Ginrut, 2013/07/31
Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Alexei Matveev, 2013/07/31