[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A bit further toward the flamewar
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: A bit further toward the flamewar |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:05:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Howdy,
address@hidden skribis:
> but I
> understand that you could be very interested in Coq proving that a
> complex recursive algorithm eventually terminates, while you don't care
> much about the type checking.
Actually, I just meant to say that type-checking is one of the many
checks one may want the compiler to perform automatically.
Ludo’.
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, (continued)
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Andy Wingo, 2011/10/14
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Hans Aberg, 2011/10/13
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Panicz Maciej Godek, 2011/10/14
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/10/13
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, rixed, 2011/10/13
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/10/13
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Hans Aberg, 2011/10/13
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/10/14
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Hans Aberg, 2011/10/14
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, rixed, 2011/10/14
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar,
Ludovic Courtès <=
Re: Why is guile still so slow?, Andy Wingo, 2011/10/12
Re: Why is guile still so slow?, John Lewis, 2011/10/12