[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile release planning
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Guile release planning |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:41:15 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) |
Neil Jerram escreveu:
> So, what do you think? There have been discussions of release
> strategy in the past, which I've seen as 50/50 between the split
> stable and development model (which we have now) and the steady new
> feature model (described above), but I don't recall them considering
> the overall community focus angle before. In my view, when we add in
> that angle, the steady new feature model is better.
One angle that we could take is time based release planning, like GNOME and
Fedora do: plan to do one or two releases per year on a rigid schedule. The
LilyPond 2.11 vs. 2.12 jump has been delaying for too long, but I generally do
a biweekly release, which is stable enough to reasonably be called 'stable', and
it has worked very well so far.
The precondition for this is that there is a good test-suite so we can be
sure that a release that passes the tests is good.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: Guile release planning, (continued)