Re: phase separation -- was Re: set-pair!

[Robby Findler]

You might try reading this paper:

http://www.cs.utah.edu/plt/publications/macromod.pdf

Robby

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:09 AM, JonWilson <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Clinton,
>
> Clinton Ebadi wrote:
>> runtime modification of
>> lexical environments is incompatible with a properly phase-separated
>> compiler).
>
> I hear a lot of mention of phase separation, usually as something
> desirable.  However, I've never seen a thorough explanation of why phase
> separation is particularly good thing.  (Nor a thorough explanation of
> exactly what it is, and google hasn't turned up anything useful so far.)
>  Would you mind giving me some pointers to reading material (or, if
> you've got nothing which is actually important to do, writing up an
> explanation yourself)?
> Regards,
> Jon
>
>
>
>