[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can scm_shell be interrupted?
From: |
Remco Bras |
Subject: |
Re: Can scm_shell be interrupted? |
Date: |
Fri, 16 May 2008 18:29:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Hello,
after the last exchange in this thread, I wrote and tested a prototype of a
repl for my app. The code for this is as follows:
int
exec_guile_shell (void *unused_arg)
{
scm_init_guile();
/*Horribly inefficient*/
while(1)
{
SCM_TICK;
SDL_mutexP(repl_signal);
scm_simple_format(scm_current_output_port(),scm_from_locale_string(PROMPT),SCM_EOL);
scm_simple_format(scm_current_output_port(),scm_from_locale_string("~S"),scm_list_1
(scm_primitive_eval(scm_read(scm_current_input_port()))));
scm_newline(scm_current_output_port());
SDL_mutexV(repl_signal);
}
return 0; //never reached, just here to please gcc.
}
This is run when the app starts, after using scm_c_define_gsubr to define the
primitive interface my app exports and after scm_c_primitive_load is used to
read in user-defined scheme files. When this function runs, the repl_signal
mutex is already locked, after which a user's file may use (run-repl) to tell
the main loop to unlock the mutex.
For the most part, this works fine, but if I use this REPL to evaluate a call
to one of the functions I have defined using scm_c_define_gsubr, for example
(stop-repl), the function is unbound in the environment the REPL uses. I've
tried using scm_interaction_environment() as a second argument to scm_eval
rather than using scm_primitive_eval, but that did not solve this problem.
I'm using guile 1.8.4 on GNU/Linux, in case that's relevant. Also, when
evaluating files using scm_c_primitive_load, the previously defined functions
are bound, regardless of whether they were defined by scm_c_define_gsubr or
another file.
Regards,
Remco.